Skip to content

Improve error recovery for some built-in macros #57205

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2018

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #55897

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 29, 2018
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @estebank

@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 30, 2018

📌 Commit df4690d has been approved by estebank

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 30, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 30, 2018

⌛ Testing commit df4690d with merge 953a9cf...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2018
Improve error recovery for some built-in macros

Fixes #55897
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 30, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: estebank
Pushing 953a9cf to master...

@bors bors merged commit df4690d into rust-lang:master Dec 30, 2018
@petrochenkov petrochenkov deleted the extrecov branch June 5, 2019 16:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants