Skip to content

Fix stabilization order of uniform_paths #58071

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2019

Conversation

Centril
Copy link
Contributor

@Centril Centril commented Feb 2, 2019

The accepted list is not correctly sorted; this PR fixes that.

r? @alexreg

@bors rollup

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 2, 2019
@varkor
Copy link
Member

varkor commented Feb 2, 2019

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 2, 2019

📌 Commit 7754eb0 has been approved by varkor

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 2, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 2, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 7754eb0 with merge 8a57831...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2019
Fix stabilization order of `uniform_paths`

The `accepted` list is not correctly sorted; this PR fixes that.

r? @alexreg

@bors rollup
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 2, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: varkor
Pushing 8a57831 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 7754eb0 into rust-lang:master Feb 2, 2019
@Centril Centril deleted the adjust-stabilization-order branch February 3, 2019 03:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants