Skip to content

doc: Remove h[123] border and increase their padding to better readability #7184

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2013

Conversation

smvv
Copy link
Contributor

@smvv smvv commented Jun 16, 2013

After reading issue #7077, all header elements had a border. In my opinion those borders are a bit too much distraction. I tried a different approach with increasing the padding and font size, and omitting the borders.

Comparison:
http://smvv.io/rust-doc/std/hashmap.html
http://static.rust-lang.org/doc/std/hashmap.html

Note: the highlighted code blocks are not caused by this commit.

I left the border of the code block / function signature as is. The reason behind that is that code blocks are really block elements, while headers are not. What do you guys think?

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Jun 16, 2013

@smvv It looks like the linked example is using the old stylesheet still. Everything looks the same to me.

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2013
After reading issue #7077, all header elements had a border. In my opinion those borders are a bit too much distraction. I tried a different approach with increasing the padding and font size, and omitting the borders.

Comparison:
http://smvv.io/rust-doc/std/hashmap.html
http://static.rust-lang.org/doc/std/hashmap.html

Note: the highlighted code blocks are not caused by this commit.

I left the border of the code block / function signature as is. The reason behind that is that code blocks are really block elements, while headers are not. What do you guys think?
@bors bors closed this Jun 17, 2013
@bors bors merged commit 64ccc60 into rust-lang:master Jun 17, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants