-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
[Experiment] Test rustc perf if compiled for x86-64-v3 #90440
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit 1487bcf with merge 991269df89178d886b9ecbb345a64e3acb385bff... |
A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain) Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
looks like a network error @bors retry |
⌛ Trying commit 1487bcf with merge ce7646d39813065021adec08c024c8975f21d42d... |
It's a cert verification failure due to another updated cert whose ca is no recognized by the ancient Debian image. |
Oh. @bors cancel |
A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain) Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
@bors try |
⌛ Trying commit 1487bcf with merge 039f38df1e7d4ce1f8eb3115af67107239b9173d... |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Queued 039f38df1e7d4ce1f8eb3115af67107239b9173d with parent dca3f1b, future comparison URL. |
Finished benchmarking commit (039f38df1e7d4ce1f8eb3115af67107239b9173d): comparison url. Summary: This change led to large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never |
@rustbot label -S-waiting-on-review |
This can of course not be committed but it might be interesting too see how much perf would be gained (or lost) from AVX2 auto-vectorization and other x86-64-v3 micro-architecture optimizations.
r? @ghost