Re-use the type op instead of calling the implied_outlives_bounds query directly

[oli-obk]

r? @ghost

[oli-obk]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-timer]

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit b85ebef with merge 478f542b5fc15d694bbe951c050e0f980667c115...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 478f542b5fc15d694bbe951c050e0f980667c115 (478f542b5fc15d694bbe951c050e0f980667c115)

[rust-timer]

Queued 478f542b5fc15d694bbe951c050e0f980667c115 with parent 56d540e, future comparison URL.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (478f542b5fc15d694bbe951c050e0f980667c115): comparison url.

Summary:

• Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found
• Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found

	Regressions 😿 (primary)	Regressions 😿 (secondary)	Improvements 🎉 (primary)	Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	All 😿 🎉 (primary)
count1	0	0	8	7	8
mean2	N/A	N/A	-0.4%	-0.3%	-0.4%
max	N/A	N/A	-0.5%	-0.5%	-0.5%

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Footnotes

1. number of relevant changes ↩

2. the arithmetic mean of the percent change ↩

[oli-obk]

Oh cool, that was an improvement on its own. Well, let's see what happens if we include a short circuit

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-timer]

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit e7a1fbc with merge b1f540c3be080f6d2647ef554a1469fc6537f225...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: b1f540c3be080f6d2647ef554a1469fc6537f225 (b1f540c3be080f6d2647ef554a1469fc6537f225)

[rust-timer]

Queued b1f540c3be080f6d2647ef554a1469fc6537f225 with parent c52b9c1, future comparison URL.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (b1f540c3be080f6d2647ef554a1469fc6537f225): comparison url.

Summary:

• Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found
• Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found

	Regressions 😿 (primary)	Regressions 😿 (secondary)	Improvements 🎉 (primary)	Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	All 😿 🎉 (primary)
count1	0	0	12	13	12
mean2	N/A	N/A	-0.4%	-0.3%	-0.4%
max	N/A	N/A	-0.6%	-0.6%	-0.6%

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Footnotes

1. number of relevant changes ↩

2. the arithmetic mean of the percent change ↩

[oli-obk]

r? rust-lang/compiler

[michaelwoerister]

r? rust-lang/traits (I don't know what a type op is 😅)

[jackh726]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit e7a1fbc has been approved by jackh726

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit e7a1fbc with merge b17e9d7...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jackh726
Pushing b17e9d7 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (b17e9d7): comparison url.

Instruction count

• Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found
• Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found

	mean1	max	count2
Regressions 😿 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Regressions 😿 (secondary)	N/A	N/A	0
Improvements 🎉 (primary)	-0.3%	-0.6%	22
Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	-0.4%	-0.7%	12
All 😿🎉 (primary)	-0.3%	-0.6%	22

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

• Primary benchmarks: mixed results
• Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found

	mean1	max	count2
Regressions 😿 (primary)	0.6%	0.6%	1
Regressions 😿 (secondary)	3.0%	3.4%	2
Improvements 🎉 (primary)	-3.9%	-3.9%	1
Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	N/A	N/A	0
All 😿🎉 (primary)	-1.7%	-3.9%	2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change ↩ ↩²

2. number of relevant changes ↩ ↩²