Skip to content

feat: add C ndarray interface and refactor implementation for stats/base/dstdevtk #4621

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

aayush0325
Copy link
Member

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • adds C ndarray interface for stats/base/dstdevtk
  • refactors JavaScript implementation
  • updates tests, docs, examples and benchmarks

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

No.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@aayush0325 aayush0325 marked this pull request as draft January 7, 2025 01:43
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Jan 7, 2025
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
stats/base/dstdevtk $\color{green}350/350$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}13/13$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}4/4$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}350/350$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: passed
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@aayush0325 aayush0325 marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 06:30
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Jan 7, 2025
Copy link
Member

@kgryte kgryte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other than the API_SUFFIX wrapping, this LGTM.

@kgryte kgryte added Needs Changes Pull request which needs changes before being merged. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Jan 8, 2025
@aayush0325 aayush0325 requested a review from kgryte January 8, 2025 07:09
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Jan 8, 2025
Copy link
Member

@kgryte kgryte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kgryte kgryte removed Needs Changes Pull request which needs changes before being merged. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Jan 8, 2025
@kgryte kgryte merged commit 4fae05a into stdlib-js:develop Jan 8, 2025
14 checks passed
0PrashantYadav0 pushed a commit to 0PrashantYadav0/stdlib that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2025
…base/dstdevtk`

PR-URL: stdlib-js#4621
Co-authored-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]>
Neerajpathak07 pushed a commit to Neerajpathak07/stdlib that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2025
…base/dstdevtk`

PR-URL: stdlib-js#4621
Co-authored-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]>
@aayush0325 aayush0325 deleted the ndarray-dstdevtk branch February 9, 2025 09:56
ShabiShett07 pushed a commit to ShabiShett07/stdlib that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
…base/dstdevtk`

PR-URL: stdlib-js#4621
Co-authored-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants