Skip to content

bench: refactor random number generation in JS benchmarks for stats/b… #5157

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yaswanthkosuru
Copy link
Contributor

@yaswanthkosuru yaswanthkosuru commented Feb 10, 2025

Resolves 4976

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • Refactor random number generation in JS benchmarks for stats/base/dists/laplace

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

…ase/dists/laplace

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---

---
type: pre_push_report
description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes.
report:
  - task: run_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_readme_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_fortran_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_julia_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_python_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_r_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_tests
    status: na
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Feb 10, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
stats/base/dists/laplace/cdf $\color{green}222/222$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}21/21$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}222/222$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/laplace/ctor $\color{green}488/488$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}36/36$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}19/19$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}488/488$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/laplace/entropy $\color{green}177/177$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}9/9$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}177/177$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/laplace/kurtosis $\color{green}175/175$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}9/9$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}175/175$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/laplace/logcdf $\color{green}222/222$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}21/21$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}222/222$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/laplace/logpdf $\color{green}219/219$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}17/17$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}219/219$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/laplace/mean $\color{green}112/112$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}7/7$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}112/112$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/laplace/median $\color{green}112/112$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}7/7$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}112/112$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/laplace/mgf $\color{green}236/236$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}18/18$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}236/236$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/laplace/mode $\color{green}175/175$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}9/9$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}175/175$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/laplace/pdf $\color{green}218/218$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}17/17$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}218/218$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/laplace/quantile $\color{green}222/222$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}21/21$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}222/222$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/laplace/skewness $\color{green}175/175$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}9/9$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}175/175$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/laplace/stdev $\color{green}176/176$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}9/9$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}176/176$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@yaswanthkosuru yaswanthkosuru marked this pull request as draft February 10, 2025 05:40
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Feb 10, 2025
…stats/base/dists/laplace

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---

---
type: pre_push_report
description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes.
report:
  - task: run_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_readme_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_fortran_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: run_julia_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_python_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_r_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_tests
    status: na
---
@yaswanthkosuru
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Planeshifter Ready for review

@yaswanthkosuru yaswanthkosuru marked this pull request as ready for review February 10, 2025 12:18
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Feb 10, 2025
scale = new Float64Array( len );
x = new Float64Array( len );
for ( i = 0; i < len; i++ ) {
x[ i ] = uniform( -100.0, 200.0 );
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
x[ i ] = uniform( -100.0, 200.0 );
x[ i ] = uniform( -100.0, 100.0 );

The range remains the same as original

x = new Float64Array( len );
for ( i = 0; i < len; i++ ) {
x[ i ] = uniform( -100.0, 200.0 );
mu[ i ] = uniform( -50.0, 100.0 );
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
mu[ i ] = uniform( -50.0, 100.0 );
mu[ i ] = uniform( -50.0, 50.0 );

Same comment as above.

len = 100;
x = new Float64Array( len );
for ( i = 0; i < len; i++ ) {
x[ i ] = uniform( -2.0, 4 );
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
x[ i ] = uniform( -2.0, 4 );
x[ i ] = uniform( -2.0, 2.0 );

This change (to keep the same original range) applies throughout the PR.

var mu;
var b;
var i;

len=100;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
len=100;
len = 100;

var mu;
var b;
var y;
var i;

mu = 2.0;
b = 3.0;
len = 100;
y = new Array( len );
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
y = new Array( len );
y = new Float64Array( len );

This change applies throughout the PR. Use Float64Array instead of Array

dist = new Laplace( mu, b );
len = 100;
for ( i = 0; i < len; i++ ) {
x[ i ] = uniform( -3.0, 6.0 );
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
x[ i ] = uniform( -3.0, 6.0 );
x[ i ] = uniform( -3.0, 3.0 );

@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ bench( pkg, function benchmark( b ) {
mu = new Float64Array( len );
scale = new Float64Array( len );
for ( i = 0; i < len; i++ ) {
mu[ i ] = ( randu() * 100.0 ) - 50.0;
scale[ i ] = ( randu() * 20.0 ) + EPS;
mu[ i ] = uniform( -50.0, 100.0 );
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
mu[ i ] = uniform( -50.0, 100.0 );
mu[ i ] = uniform( -50.0, 50.0 );

@anandkaranubc anandkaranubc added the Needs Changes Pull request which needs changes before being merged. label Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs Changes Pull request which needs changes before being merged. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[RFC]: Refactor random number generation in JS benchmarks for stats/base/dists/laplace
3 participants