Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 3, 2025. It is now read-only.

Fix grammar #62

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix grammar #62

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ Note: The `Operators` function and the above decorators could be exposed from a

For a detailed investigation, see [LANGCOMP.md](https://github.com/littledan/proposal-operator-overloading/blob/master/LANGCOMP.md). tl;dr:
- It's a pretty popular design choice to conservatively support overloading only on some operators, and to define some in terms of others, as this proposal does. User-defined operators have been difficult to varying extents in other programming languages.
- The way this proposal dispatches on the two operands is somewhat novel, most similar to Matlab. Unfortunately, of the established, popular mechanisms meet the design goals articulated in this document.
- The way this proposal dispatches on the two operands is somewhat novel, most similar to Matlab. Unfortunately, none of the established, popular mechanisms meet the design goals articulated in this document.

### Can this work with subclasses, rather than only defining overloading on base classes?

Expand Down