Skip to content

Create codeql-analysis.yml #356

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2022
Merged

Create codeql-analysis.yml #356

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2022

Conversation

tony
Copy link
Member

@tony tony commented Feb 26, 2022

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #356 (9cba15d) into master (8038abd) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 9cba15d differs from pull request most recent head 008e413. Consider uploading reports for the commit 008e413 to get more accurate results

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #356   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.80%   87.80%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines        1500     1500           
=======================================
  Hits         1317     1317           
  Misses        183      183           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8038abd...008e413. Read the comment docs.

@tony tony force-pushed the codeql-analysis branch from 57ef2dd to 405abdc Compare March 3, 2022 23:23
@tony tony force-pushed the codeql-analysis branch from 9cba15d to 008e413 Compare March 5, 2022 21:58
@tony tony merged commit 2f884fe into master Mar 5, 2022
@tony tony deleted the codeql-analysis branch March 5, 2022 22:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant