Skip to content

Bump tree sitter to 0.20.7 and expose highlights query in rust binding, take 3 #101

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 8, 2023

Conversation

eed3si9n
Copy link
Collaborator

@eed3si9n eed3si9n commented Jan 8, 2023

This is a resend of #100 minus a generated file.

@eed3si9n eed3si9n changed the title Bump tree sitter to 0.20.7 and expose highlights query in rust binding Bump tree sitter to 0.20.7 and expose highlights query in rust binding, take 3 Jan 8, 2023
@eed3si9n eed3si9n merged commit 1e04381 into tree-sitter:master Jan 8, 2023
@eed3si9n eed3si9n deleted the wip/100 branch January 8, 2023 05:59
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "tree-sitter-scala",
"version": "0.19.1",
"version": "0.20.7",
Copy link
Collaborator

@ckipp01 ckipp01 Jan 8, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aren't these versions independent of each other? Meaning we bumped the one down below, but that shouldn't necessarily bump this also to 0.20.7 since this is our release version. Shouldn't this just be the semver version of tree-sitter-scala?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea. The whole situation around versioning these grammar is murky to me. It's as-if grammars evolve at its own pace but the version is given at the timing of tree-sitter release?
It would also be convenient to know which grammar is expected to work with which tree-sitter version if there's some dependency, so the version might be functioning for the marker as well (like _2.12 suffix in Scala world).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants