chore: generate latest changes #135
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Generated from fd05f09
ckipp01
added a commit
to ckipp01/nvim-treesitter
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2023
There has been a lot of changes recently to the Scala grammar and we've been merging in a handful of things before syncing the actual generated parser. We are currently at a stage where we're going to sync everything, but there are some breaking changes that are included in tree-sitter/tree-sitter-scala#135, so when that commit gets synced here stuff will break. We've taken the queries that existed here and have been building off of them in the actual upstream repo. This will hopefully make the transition smooth and updates the queries to ensure that there is no breakage. It's recommended to wait until that pr is merged, synced here, and then merge this in around the same time. Co-authored-by: eugene yokota <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anton Sviridov <[email protected]>
|
I've also created nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter#4153 to sync everything. |
keynmol
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2023
ckipp01
added a commit
to ckipp01/nvim-treesitter
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2023
There has been a lot of changes recently to the Scala grammar and we've been merging in a handful of things before syncing the actual generated parser. We are currently at a stage where we're going to sync everything, but there are some breaking changes that are included in tree-sitter/tree-sitter-scala#135, so when that commit gets synced here stuff will break. We've taken the queries that existed here and have been building off of them in the actual upstream repo. This will hopefully make the transition smooth and updates the queries to ensure that there is no breakage. It's recommended to wait until that pr is merged, synced here, and then merge this in around the same time. Co-authored-by: eugene yokota <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anton Sviridov <[email protected]>
ckipp01
added a commit
to ckipp01/nvim-treesitter
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2023
There has been a lot of changes recently to the Scala grammar and we've been merging in a handful of things before syncing the actual generated parser. We are currently at a stage where we're going to sync everything, but there are some breaking changes that are included in tree-sitter/tree-sitter-scala#135, so when that commit gets synced here stuff will break. We've taken the queries that existed here and have been building off of them in the actual upstream repo. This will hopefully make the transition smooth and updates the queries to ensure that there is no breakage. It's recommended to wait until that pr is merged, synced here, and then merge this in around the same time. Co-authored-by: eugene yokota <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anton Sviridov <[email protected]>
ckipp01
added a commit
to ckipp01/nvim-treesitter
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2023
There has been a lot of changes recently to the Scala grammar and we've been merging in a handful of things before syncing the actual generated parser. We are currently at a stage where we're going to sync everything, but there are some breaking changes that are included in tree-sitter/tree-sitter-scala#135, so when that commit gets synced here stuff will break. We've taken the queries that existed here and have been building off of them in the actual upstream repo. This will hopefully make the transition smooth and updates the queries to ensure that there is no breakage. It's recommended to wait until that pr is merged, synced here, and then merge this in around the same time. Co-authored-by: eugene yokota <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anton Sviridov <[email protected]>
ckipp01
added a commit
to ckipp01/nvim-treesitter
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2023
There has been a lot of changes recently to the Scala grammar and we've been merging in a handful of things before syncing the actual generated parser. We are currently at a stage where we're going to sync everything, but there are some breaking changes that are included in tree-sitter/tree-sitter-scala#135, so when that commit gets synced here stuff will break. We've taken the queries that existed here and have been building off of them in the actual upstream repo. This will hopefully make the transition smooth and updates the queries to ensure that there is no breakage. It's recommended to wait until that pr is merged, synced here, and then merge this in around the same time. Co-authored-by: eugene yokota <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anton Sviridov <[email protected]>
ckipp01
added a commit
to ckipp01/nvim-treesitter
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2023
There has been a lot of changes recently to the Scala grammar and we've been merging in a handful of things before syncing the actual generated parser. We are currently at a stage where we're going to sync everything, but there are some breaking changes that are included in tree-sitter/tree-sitter-scala#135, so when that commit gets synced here stuff will break. We've taken the queries that existed here and have been building off of them in the actual upstream repo. This will hopefully make the transition smooth and updates the queries to ensure that there is no breakage. It's recommended to wait until that pr is merged, synced here, and then merge this in around the same time. Co-authored-by: eugene yokota <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anton Sviridov <[email protected]>
theHamsta
pushed a commit
to nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2023
There has been a lot of changes recently to the Scala grammar and we've been merging in a handful of things before syncing the actual generated parser. We are currently at a stage where we're going to sync everything, but there are some breaking changes that are included in tree-sitter/tree-sitter-scala#135, so when that commit gets synced here stuff will break. We've taken the queries that existed here and have been building off of them in the actual upstream repo. This will hopefully make the transition smooth and updates the queries to ensure that there is no breakage. It's recommended to wait until that pr is merged, synced here, and then merge this in around the same time. Co-authored-by: eugene yokota <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anton Sviridov <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Generated from fd05f09