Structural types in declarations #297
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eed3si9n
requested changes
Jun 10, 2023
susliko
force-pushed
the
structural-types
branch
2 times, most recently
from
45a4f33 to
bc9fb98
Compare
Problem
-------
Structural types in declarations are not parsed:
```
val x: F { val y: Int }
```
Solution
-------
Remove -1 precedence for `$._structural_type` branch of `$.compount_type`, resolve conflict with `$._type` explicitly
Extra changes
-------
Removed some unused conflict resolutions
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Structural types in declarations are not parsed:
Solution
Remove -1 precedence for
$._structural_typebranch of$.compount_type, resolve conflict with$._typeexplicitlyExtra changes
Removed some unused conflict resolutions