Java/C: Improve performance when multiple configs use field flow. #99
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
aschackmull
added
C++
depends on internal PR
|
|
aschackmull
force-pushed
the
java/fieldflow-perf
branch
from
5220b77 to
f2760f2
Compare
|
Rebased. |
jbj
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2018
aibaars
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2021
CFG: Use manual `toString()`s for `AstCfgNode` when available
smowton
pushed a commit
to smowton/codeql
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2021
Change build script to build multiple versions of the plugin
erik-krogh
pushed a commit
to erik-krogh/ql
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2021
Add query: Missing `noinline`
erik-krogh
pushed a commit
to erik-krogh/ql
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2021
Add query: Missing `noinline`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
useFieldFlowis unary and should therefore not use unbind as that just causes a cartesian product, and joining directly on the config is fine as it won't introduce other fields.