Skip to content

Scale up CLTV_FAR_FAR_AWAY to 2 weeks of blocks #1532

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -870,7 +870,13 @@ pub(crate) const MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT: u16 = 2 * 6 * 24 * 7;
// the HTLC via a full update_fail_htlc/commitment_signed dance before we hit the
// CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER point (we static assert that it's at least 3 blocks more).
pub const MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA: u16 = 6*7;
pub(super) const CLTV_FAR_FAR_AWAY: u32 = 6 * 24 * 7; //TODO?
// This should be long enough to allow a payment path drawn across multiple routing hops with substantial
// `cltv_expiry_delta`. Indeed, the length of those values is the reaction delay offered to a routing node
// in case of HTLC on-chain settlement. While appearing less competitive, a node operator could decide to
// scale them up to suit its security policy. At the network-level, we shouldn't constrain them too much,
// while avoiding to introduce a DoS vector. Further, a low CTLV_FAR_FAR_AWAY could be a source of
// routing failure for any HTLC sender picking up an LDK node among the first hops.
pub(super) const CLTV_FAR_FAR_AWAY: u32 = 14 * 24 * 6;

/// Minimum CLTV difference between the current block height and received inbound payments.
/// Invoices generated for payment to us must set their `min_final_cltv_expiry` field to at least
Expand Down