-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
[lldb] Support both Lua 5.3 and Lua 5.4 #115500
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Lua 5.3 and Lua 5.4 are similar enough that we can easily support both in LLDB. This patch adds support for building LLDB with both and updates the documentation accordingly.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb Author: Jonas Devlieghere (JDevlieghere) ChangesLua 5.3 and Lua 5.4 are similar enough that we can easily support both in LLDB. This patch adds support for building LLDB with both and updates the documentation accordingly. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115500.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/lldb/CMakeLists.txt b/lldb/CMakeLists.txt
index 5827e04b5662f3..20fbb57d62e69a 100644
--- a/lldb/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/lldb/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -87,8 +87,7 @@ if (LLDB_ENABLE_PYTHON)
endif ()
if (LLDB_ENABLE_LUA)
- find_program(Lua_EXECUTABLE lua5.3)
- set(LLDB_LUA_DEFAULT_RELATIVE_PATH "lib/lua/5.3")
+ set(LLDB_LUA_DEFAULT_RELATIVE_PATH "lib/lua/${LUA_VERSION_MAJOR}.${LUA_VERSION_MINOR}")
set(LLDB_LUA_RELATIVE_PATH ${LLDB_LUA_DEFAULT_RELATIVE_PATH}
CACHE STRING "Path where Lua modules are installed, relative to install prefix")
endif ()
diff --git a/lldb/cmake/modules/FindLuaAndSwig.cmake b/lldb/cmake/modules/FindLuaAndSwig.cmake
index 11548b76f843f0..33fadb2a097407 100644
--- a/lldb/cmake/modules/FindLuaAndSwig.cmake
+++ b/lldb/cmake/modules/FindLuaAndSwig.cmake
@@ -8,11 +8,21 @@ if(LUA_LIBRARIES AND LUA_INCLUDE_DIR AND LLDB_ENABLE_SWIG)
set(LUAANDSWIG_FOUND TRUE)
else()
if (LLDB_ENABLE_SWIG)
- find_package(Lua 5.3 EXACT)
+ find_package(Lua 5.3)
if(LUA_FOUND)
+ # Find the Lua executable. Only required to run a subset of the Lua
+ # tests.
+ find_program(LUA_EXECUTABLE
+ NAMES
+ "lua"
+ "lua${LUA_VERSION_MAJOR}.${LUA_VERSION_MINOR}"
+ )
mark_as_advanced(
LUA_LIBRARIES
- LUA_INCLUDE_DIR)
+ LUA_INCLUDE_DIR
+ LUA_VERSION_MINOR
+ LUA_VERSION_MAJOR
+ LUA_EXECUTABLE)
endif()
else()
message(STATUS "SWIG 4 or later is required for Lua support in LLDB but could not be found")
@@ -26,5 +36,7 @@ else()
REQUIRED_VARS
LUA_LIBRARIES
LUA_INCLUDE_DIR
+ LUA_VERSION_MINOR
+ LUA_VERSION_MAJOR
LLDB_ENABLE_SWIG)
endif()
diff --git a/lldb/docs/resources/build.rst b/lldb/docs/resources/build.rst
index 33b6a6f79def4b..66db84522bff1f 100644
--- a/lldb/docs/resources/build.rst
+++ b/lldb/docs/resources/build.rst
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ CMake configuration error.
+-------------------+------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+
| Python | Python scripting | ``LLDB_ENABLE_PYTHON`` |
+-------------------+------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+
-| Lua | Lua scripting | ``LLDB_ENABLE_LUA`` |
+| Lua | Lua scripting. Lua 5.3 and 5.4 are supported. | ``LLDB_ENABLE_LUA`` |
+-------------------+------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+
Depending on your platform and package manager, one might run any of the
diff --git a/lldb/test/API/lit.site.cfg.py.in b/lldb/test/API/lit.site.cfg.py.in
index 7dd8ffd2f5cb4c..ff6c705caea96c 100644
--- a/lldb/test/API/lit.site.cfg.py.in
+++ b/lldb/test/API/lit.site.cfg.py.in
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ config.llvm_use_sanitizer = "@LLVM_USE_SANITIZER@"
config.target_triple = "@LLVM_TARGET_TRIPLE@"
config.lldb_build_directory = "@LLDB_TEST_BUILD_DIRECTORY@"
config.python_executable = "@Python3_EXECUTABLE@"
-config.lua_executable = "@Lua_EXECUTABLE@"
+config.lua_executable = "@LUA_EXECUTABLE@"
config.lua_test_entry = "TestLuaAPI.py"
config.dotest_common_args_str = lit_config.substitute("@LLDB_TEST_COMMON_ARGS@")
config.dotest_user_args_str = lit_config.substitute("@LLDB_TEST_USER_ARGS@")
|
I'm not a fan of how TestLuaAPI.py works today. I think it should be its own lit format, without going through |
You could even say you detest it. :P |
Spell-checkers sometimes reveal hidden truths...
Jim
… On Nov 8, 2024, at 10:52 AM, Pavel Labath ***@***.***> wrote:
detest.py
I'm not a fan of how TestLuaAPI.py works today.
You could even say you detest it. :P
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#115500 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUPVW7FOYIDI5IQKO376JDZ7UB67AVCNFSM6AAAAABRNYDZTKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINRVGUZTMMBVHE>.
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
|
I'd say this was a Freudian slip. |
Lua 5.3 and Lua 5.4 are similar enough that we can easily support both in LLDB. This patch adds support for building LLDB with both and updates the documentation accordingly. (cherry picked from commit e19d740)
[lldb] Support both Lua 5.3 and Lua 5.4 (llvm#115500)
Lua 5.3 and Lua 5.4 are similar enough that we can easily support both in LLDB. This patch adds support for building LLDB with both and updates the documentation accordingly.
Lua 5.3 and Lua 5.4 are similar enough that we can easily support both in LLDB. This patch adds support for building LLDB with both and updates the documentation accordingly.