Skip to content

Mbostock/xlsx tweaks #254

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 16, 2021
Merged

Mbostock/xlsx tweaks #254

merged 7 commits into from
Sep 16, 2021

Conversation

mbostock
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@mbostock mbostock requested a review from visnup September 15, 2021 18:56
Copy link
Member

@visnup visnup left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, at some point I switched from immediate comments back to review comments so this is the last batch of replies.

I'll go ahead and add a commit to make some of these changes.

@visnup visnup force-pushed the mbostock/xlsx-tweaks branch from 74c9445 to 4193b19 Compare September 15, 2021 22:01
@visnup visnup force-pushed the mbostock/xlsx-tweaks branch from 4193b19 to fe6a1b4 Compare September 15, 2021 22:02
* Use Object.create(null)

* Prefer public ExcelJS APIs

* Use latest tap API
Co-authored-by: Mike Bostock <[email protected]>
@mbostock mbostock marked this pull request as ready for review September 16, 2021 05:03
Copy link
Member Author

@mbostock mbostock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. 👍

@visnup
Copy link
Member

visnup commented Sep 16, 2021

Going to merge now and deal with all the version bumping and publishing tomorrow morning.

@visnup visnup merged commit c85c581 into main Sep 16, 2021
@visnup visnup deleted the mbostock/xlsx-tweaks branch September 16, 2021 05:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants