Skip to content

Update jasmine to the latest version 🚀 #4547

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Feb 6, 2018

Version 2.99.0 of jasmine was just published.

Dependency jasmine
Current Version 2.9.0
Type devDependency

The version 2.99.0 is not covered by your current version range.

If you don’t accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.

It might be worth looking into these changes and trying to get this project onto the latest version of jasmine.

If you have a solid test suite and good coverage, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes directly by merging the proposed change into your project. If the build fails or you don’t have such unconditional trust in your tests, this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Commits

The new version differs by 2 commits.

  • 353fecc bump version to 2.99
  • 4d48e70 ignore package-lock so we always get new versions in CI

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper bot 🌴

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2018
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Feb 6, 2018

Version 3.0.0 just got published.

Update to this version instead 🚀

Commits

The new version differs by 17 commits.

  • 74d3e96 bump version to 3.0
  • b8cf9aa Merge branch 'master' into 3.0-features
  • b831ccf Add --fail-fast to help message
  • 375b7aa Support stopping jasmine execution on first spec failure
  • 9aea4e9 Add ability to pass --reporter on the command line
  • 76f9fa2 Print full details for suite failures
  • 38d5568 Report how to re-run Jasmine with the current seed
  • 9af225e Run specs in random order by default
  • 1e5a1f6 Merge branch 'master' into 3.0-features
  • f55808f Updated node.js versions
  • ca8e39b Ignore vim swap files
  • a17e3f9 Depend on core 3.0
  • 5643389 Added an editorconfig file
  • 894f6c3 Treat suites with focused specs as failures
  • dcca51c Removed deprecated completion callback from console reporter

There are 17 commits in total.

See the full diff

flovilmart pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2018
flovilmart added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2018
* chore(package): update jasmine to version 3.0.0

Closes #4547

* Fixes failing tests for jasmine 3.0

Starting 3.0, done(something) will fail

* Update tests so they dont leverage var, but let and const

With jasmine 3.0, the randomization engine was making the test fails because of the scope of `var`

* Remove randomizer

* Use same adapter for PG tests, drop table to ensure the tests dont side effect
@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot deleted the greenkeeper/jasmine-2.99.0 branch February 17, 2018 14:55
UnderratedDev pushed a commit to UnderratedDev/parse-server that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2020
* chore(package): update jasmine to version 3.0.0

Closes parse-community#4547

* Fixes failing tests for jasmine 3.0

Starting 3.0, done(something) will fail

* Update tests so they dont leverage var, but let and const

With jasmine 3.0, the randomization engine was making the test fails because of the scope of `var`

* Remove randomizer

* Use same adapter for PG tests, drop table to ensure the tests dont side effect
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants