Avoid dimshuffle if expand_dims has empty axis

[HangenYuu]

Description

A small eager optimization to avoid useless dimshuffles in expand_dims, follwing squeeze logic.

Related Issue

• Closes Avoid dimshuffle if expand_dims has empty axis #707
• Related to #

Checklist

• Checked that the pre-commit linting/style checks pass
• Included tests that prove the fix is effective or that the new feature works
• Added necessary documentation (docstrings and/or example notebooks)
• If you are a pro: each commit corresponds to a relevant logical change

Type of change

• New feature / enhancement
• Bug fix
• Documentation
• Maintenance
• Other (please specify):

[HangenYuu]

@ricardoV94 Updated here from #718.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.76%. Comparing base (86bc1d2) to head (65fefce).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #724      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.76%   80.76%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         162      162              
  Lines       46713    46715       +2     
  Branches    11426    11427       +1     
==========================================
  Hits        37729    37729              
- Misses       6732     6736       +4     
+ Partials     2252     2250       -2     

Files	Coverage Δ
pytensor/tensor/basic.py	88.25% <0.00%> (-0.11%)	⬇️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

[ricardoV94]

Looks good, just a small tweak

[ricardoV94]

Small request, can you edit the title to be more like the original issue?

This is what shows up on the automatic release notes and the current title is completely uninformative for someone only reading it

[HangenYuu]

@ricardoV94

[ricardoV94]

Thanks! I hope the git stuff was not too frustrating