Skip to content

add dropck_outlives comments #114170

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 2, 2023
Merged

add dropck_outlives comments #114170

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 2, 2023

Conversation

lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr commented Jul 28, 2023

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 28, 2023

r? @eholk

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 28, 2023
// wrapper means we don't need an infcx in this code, which is
// good because the interface doesn't give us one (so that we
// know we are not registering any subregion relations or
// other things).
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

infcx.at(...).dropck_outlives(...) has been removed after we finalized the switch to NLL as dropck_outlives is now exclusively used during mir borrowck

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

(r=me either clarifying the "not" bc I'm confused by the wording of that sentence, or fixing it)

r? @compiler-errors

@rustbot rustbot assigned compiler-errors and unassigned eholk Jul 28, 2023
@compiler-errors compiler-errors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 28, 2023
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented Jul 31, 2023

the comment was just plainly wrong 😅 forgot the meaning of boring_locals, rewrote that section.

@lcnr lcnr added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Aug 1, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2023

📌 Commit fc98c5a has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 1, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 2, 2023

⌛ Testing commit fc98c5a with merge 90bb418...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 2, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing 90bb418 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Aug 2, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 90bb418 into rust-lang:master Aug 2, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.73.0 milestone Aug 2, 2023
@lcnr lcnr deleted the add-commmentz branch August 2, 2023 12:47
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (90bb418): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.4% [-2.4%, -2.4%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: missing data

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants