Skip to content

Fix option link and anchor links. #28420

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 16, 2015
Merged

Fix option link and anchor links. #28420

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 16, 2015

Conversation

alexispurslane
Copy link
Contributor

This was pointed out by @filsmick and @swatteau in #28412.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @brson (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@alexispurslane
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @steveklabnik

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned steveklabnik and unassigned brson Sep 15, 2015
@alexispurslane
Copy link
Contributor Author

(Squashed the commits.)

@semmaz
Copy link
Contributor

semmaz commented Sep 15, 2015

@steveklabnik @ChristopherDumas Shouldn't it be "fixed" the other way round, making rustdoc rendered id and href attributes of section identical to href rendered by github (discarding special chars)?

I'm willing to give it a try and see how many of breakage it will introduce to docs.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@semmaz it would be nice if rustdoc were fixed to do that, but in the meantime, this is a nice, quick fix. With the release coming out soon, this can be backported, and we can fix the underlying issue For Real later, which will take more time. If you'd like to work on that, please do!

@ChristopherDumas you still have some LLVM changes in here :)

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

oh, no, you fixed it. but it's still out of date for some reason, can you try to rebase please?

@alexispurslane
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure

@alexispurslane
Copy link
Contributor Author

I rebased this.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 15, 2015

📌 Commit e66a1dc has been approved by steveklabnik

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2015
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 16, 2015

⌛ Testing commit e66a1dc with merge 1fe126a...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2015
@bors bors merged commit e66a1dc into rust-lang:master Sep 16, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants