Skip to content

reference: add link to the symbols #28906

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2015
Merged

reference: add link to the symbols #28906

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2015

Conversation

tshepang
Copy link
Member

@tshepang tshepang commented Oct 8, 2015

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 8, 2015

📌 Commit 37934b7 has been approved by steveklabnik

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2015
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 8, 2015

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #28913) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 9, 2015

🔒 Merge conflict

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2015
@tshepang
Copy link
Member Author

conflict fixed

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 14, 2015

📌 Commit 0dbc2ef has been approved by nikomatsakis

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2015
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2015
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 0dbc2ef into rust-lang:master Oct 15, 2015
@tshepang tshepang deleted the link branch December 17, 2015 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants